Global Eye
Blurred Vision
By Chris Floyd
Published: September 17, 2004
By the time the dynastic manipulations
of his family put Tiberius
Caesar in power, the Roman Republic had long been a gutted carcass.
Although the outward lineaments of state retained many of the old forms
of popular government, behind these bones and tatters of hide there was
nothing left but pestilent corruption and vicious court intrigue.
Tiberius -- a cynical mediocrity overwhelmed by his responsibilities
but too weak to give up the privileges that attended them -- knew full
well the brutal reality that the ruling elite kept hidden beneath
layers of pious sham and patriotic cant. When he saw how the great
Senate -- where giants once clashed in fierce, open debate -- would
come crawling to him, bowing and scraping, eager to act on his every
whim, to accept his most brazen lies as sacred truth, he could not
contain his disgust. "Men fit to be slaves," he would mutter, as they
bent once again to his will.
No doubt the saturnine old ghost was smiling
with grim satisfaction last week as another once-great deliberative
body debased itself before a mediocre dynast. In one of the more
shameless in a long series of vile and craven acts, the
Republican-dominated U.S. House of Representatives smeared partisan
filth across a legislative memorial to the innocents murdered on Sept.
11, 2001, by conflating that national tragedy with George W. Bush's war
of aggression against Iraq.
The Bushist toadies couldn't simply mark the solemn occasion with a few
appropriate words of common grief and resolve. Instead, they turned the
resolution into a tribute to the Dear Leader, larding it with praise
for Bush's "reorganizing" of the United States (that old Constitutional
malarkey had to go) "in order to more effectively wage the Global War
on Terrorism" -- including, of course, the "destruction" of the
"terrorist regime" in Iraq. Yet while the capture of Dick Cheney's
former business partner, Saddam Hussein, was given prominent play in
the resolution, the actual perpetrator of the Sept. 11 attacks, Osama
bin Laden, was never mentioned.
Thus this witless assemblage of bagmen and bootlickers (including, as
usual, the vast majority of Democratic jellyfish) officially affirmed
Bush's blood libel, his Hitlerian Big Lie: the supposed connection
between Saddam and 9/11. "You can't distinguish between al Qaida and
Saddam when you talk about the war on terror," Bush said in September
2002, when rolling out what his staff called the "product" -- i.e. a
calculated campaign of fear and deception to drive the nation into war.
"We've eliminated an ally of al Qaida," he declared in May 2003, while
prancing about in military drag during his infamous "Mission
Accomplished" speech. Bush and his minions have pounded this mendacious
war drum so often, in so many ways, that even now, up to 50 percent of
Americans still believe that Saddam was involved directly or indirectly
in the 9/11 attacks -- although this canard was debunked yet again last
week, this time by Colin Powell, The Washington Post reports.
These lies have already led to the deaths of more than a thousand
American troops -- and more than 30,000 innocent Iraqi civilians: a
murderous hurricane 10 times the size of the storm that struck America
on 9/11. Yet still the toadies crawled before the unelected pipsqueak,
the oath-breaking coward who walked away from his own military service
during wartime but now press-gangs soldiers into combat even after
they've fulfilled their sworn duty requirements.
The House measure slavishly regurgitated Bush's ludicrous assertion
that the attack by Mr. Unnameable and his al Qaida crew was an assault
on "the principles and values of the American people." But Bush knows
that bin Laden doesn't care one way or another about American "values
and principles," just as he didn't care about Soviet "principles and
values" when he and the CIA were feasting on Red meat in Afghanistan
back in the day. It's not "principles" but power politics that fuel bin
Laden's aggression -- the same as with Bush. And both men's ultimate
goal is the same: domination of the world's oil supply, which will
bring them and their cronies untold riches and the power to further
advance their harsh, perverted visions of society and religion. As
we've said before, the "war on terror" is not a "clash of
civilizations" or a "battle for freedom" -- it's a falling out among
thieves, a gang fight over juicy turf.
The
Congressional toadies are right about one thing, however: America's
principles and values are under ferocious assault. But the assailant is
their own little tin-pot Tiberius. Last week saw more damning
revelations of the torture regime that Bush and his chief warlord,
Donald Rumsfeld, have spread across the face of the earth. Seymour
Hersh's new book, "Chain of Command," lays out in bone-chilling detail
the system of assassination, sadism, rape and psycho-terror established
by Bush, who issued secret presidential directives lifting legal
constraints and even administrative oversight on his hit men and
torturers. The dark heart of this black-op beast is the "Special-Access
Program," created by Bush and Rumsfeld in late 2001 and sent forth with
this sinister dictum, according to top intelligence officials: "Grab
whom you must. Do what you want."
These are the true "principles and values" that Bush is defending in
his toady-lauded "war on terror" -- values he shares with his
cave-dwelling doppelganger, Osama. Each uses the other to justify his
own outrages, each feeds on the other to fuel his own bloodlust and
political ambitions. Only a fool, or a hireling -- or a slave -- would
bend to the will of such loathsome creatures.
Chris Floyd's new book, "Empire Burlesque," is available
at www.globaleyefloyd.com.
Annotations
Seymour Hersh: Rumsfeld's Dirty War on Terror
The Guardian, Sept. 13, 2004
Osama: A Texas-Style Republican in Islamic Clothing
Online Journal, Sept. 12, 2004
Bush Team Knew of Abuse at Guantanamo
The Guardian, Sept. 13, 2004
House Resolution on September 11, 2001 Attacks
U.S. House of Representatives, Sept. 9,
2004
Powell Sees no Direct Link Between Saddam, 9/11
Washington Post, Sept. 12, 2004
Some Lawmakers Question 9/11 Resolution
Washington Post, Sept. 9, 2004
Al Qaeda Duped West Into Waging War: UK Envoy to Iraq
The Scotsman, Sept. 11, 2004
Osama's Goals: September 11 and its Aftermath
Informed Comment, Sept. 11, 2004
Bush Has Always Been Soft on Terror
The Guardian, Sept. 11, 2004
Operation Ignore
Excerpt, "Lies and the Lying Liars Who
Tell Them," by Al Franken
The Hidden History of CIA Torture
TomDispatch.com, Sept. 9, 2004
US Troops Face New Torture Claims
The Guardian, Sept. 14, 2004
Poll: Many Americans Still Believe Iraq Had WMD
Associated Press, Aug. 20, 2004
Tiberius
Encyclopedia of Roman Emperors, Penn State
University, Dec. 22, 2001
Senators Censure CIA in Iraq Abuse Probe
Associated Press, Sept. 9, 2004
Reagan's WMD Connection to Saddam Hussein
Freedom Foundation, June 18, 2004
Cheney Made Millions From Oil Deals With Hussein
San Francisco Bay Guardian, Nov. 13, 2000
Copyright
© 2004 The Moscow Times. All rights reserved.
|