Team Spirit
Recent history shows exactly how, and
why, the intelligence data concerning Iraq's nonexistent WMD became a justification
for military aggression.
By Chris Floyd
The confession by the Bush Administration's
chief arms investigator that Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction before
the war has sent a thunderbolt of puzzlement through the pundits and politicians
of the Anglo-American elite. "How could the intelligence reports have been
so wrong?" they cry, wringing their hands in consternation. "Independent"
commissions filled with Establishment worthies are now in the offing, as
the architects of the war -- and their media sycophants -- pledge to resolve
this disturbing mystery.
But of course there is no "mystery." Anyone with a passing acquaintance of
recent history knows exactly how, and why, the intelligence data concerning
Iraq's nonexistent WMD came to be used as a justification for military aggression.
Indeed, this history is so open, so transparent and so widely available --
in news reports, unclassified government documents, think-tank publications,
etc. -- that a cynic might suspect that these government-appointed "investigations"
are actually designed to obscure the already evident truth.
It began in 1976, when CIA Director George Bush established a new intelligence
analysis unit called "Team B." Championed by top White House officials Dick
Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, the Bush unit was packed with hardcore ideologues
-- including Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Perle -- bent on "proving" a predetermined
conclusion: that regular CIA assessments of the Soviet Union were "too soft,"
ignoring the "imminent threat" of Soviet aggression and the Kremlin's ever-increasing
political and economic might, as American Prospect (among many others) reports.
At every turn, the B-Teamers cooked and distorted intelligence data to fit
their agenda. Scare stories were regularly leaked to credulous journalists
to whip up public fear; legislators were plied with "top-secret" briefings
to win Congressional support for massive increases in military spending. During
the Reagan-Bush years, the B-Teamers and their acolytes spread throughout
the corridors of power, where they launched covert operations and proxy wars
around the world, always citing "credible evidence" of "imminent threats"
-- such as Ronald Reagan's famous warning that tiny Nicaragua, then besieged
by a U.S.-backed terrorist army, could invade the sacred American heartland
of Texas in a matter of hours.
As it turned out, even the "softest" CIA assessments vastly underestimated
the weakness and instability of the Soviet regime. Team B's wildly inflated
perversions of reality were exposed as perhaps the most incompetent, ignorant
-- and costly -- intelligence failures in U.S. history. For in addition to
the lives and money wasted fighting phantom threats "to America's very survival,"
the now thoroughly B-Teamed CIA armed and funded a horde of Islamic extremists
in Afghanistan, schooling them in "asymmetric warfare" and terrorist operations.
No doubt the B-Teamer's ideologically blinded "intelligence" told them that
the Western-hating jihadists would never turn this training against their
American paymasters.
The end of the Soviet Union found Team B still entrenched in the White House.
In 1992, Bush, now president, directed Cheney, now Pentagon chief, and his
deputy, Wolfowitz, to draw up a plan for America's strategic future. Despite
the collapse of the Communist enemy, the plan called for -- what else? --
massive increases in military spending and a more aggressive, unilateral "pre-emptive"
posture against perceived threats to American interests, with "vital raw
materials, primarily Persian Gulf Oil" listed as the first priority, the
New York Times reports. The objective, openly stated, was American dominance
over global economic and political development in all spheres.
The Cheney-Wolfowitz plan was then refined by the B-Teamers during the Clinton
interregnum. One of their groups, Project for the New American Century, whose
members included Cheney, Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld, published a manifesto in
September 2000 that incorporated the 1992 plan and openly called for the expansion
of American military presence all over the planet, and into outer space as
well -- "full spectrum dominance" for "U.S. warfighters" and "economic interests."
It specifically insisted on the establishment of U.S military power in Iraq,
a strategic need that "transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein."
But PNAC warned, openly, plainly, that this "revolutionary transformation"
of American society would probably not take place -- unless the American
people were "catalyzed" by a "new Pearl Harbor."
When George W. Bush took office, he restored Team B to glory and enshrined
PNAC's plan as the official national security strategy of the United States,
adding a new imperative to establish "the single sustainable model of national
success" -- Bush-Enron crony capitalism -- in every land. After the "new Pearl
Harbor" of Sept. 11, 2001, Rumsfeld created a new "Team B" at the Pentagon:
the Office of Special Plans, packed with hard-line ideologues bent on "proving"
a predetermined conclusion: that regular CIA assessments of Iraq were "too
soft," ignoring the "imminent threat" of Saddam's aggression and his vast
arsenal of WMD, The New Yorker reports.
At every turn, the OSP cooked and distorted intelligence data to fit their
agenda. Scare stories were regularly leaked to credulous journalists to whip
up public fear; legislators were plied with "top-secret" briefings to win
Congressional support for the invasion. Rumor, hearsay, and forgeries were
"stovepiped" directly to the White House, bypassing professional analysts.
Anything that contradicted the Bush Regime's ideological delusions was ruthlessly
pruned away. Anything that flattered their desire for war -- no matter how
specious, how false -- was eagerly embraced.
So there's no mystery in the current situation. It's how "Team Bush" has
always operated. They pervert intelligence to suit their needs -- and their
greeds. When they're proved wrong -- at a horrendous cost in blood and money
– they never admit it, never apologize. They simply break out the whitewash,
blame someone else -- usually the very intelligence services they've suborned
-- and lumber on in their brutal quest for dominance: ignorant, incompetent
and untouchable to the end.
Annotations
Selective Intelligence
The New Yorker, May 12, 2003
If At First You Don't Succeed [Team B]
American Prospect, Nov. 4, 2003
Team B: The Trillion-Dollar Experiment
Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, April 1993,
It Last Happened in 1976
Foreign Policy Forum, Oct. 22, 2003
The Lie Factory
Mother Jones, Jan. 12, 2004 (fee required)
In Rumsfeld's
Shop
American Conservative, Dec. 1, 2003
Open
Door Policy
American Conservative, Jan. 19, 2004
Intelligence Effort Led by Cheney Magnified Errors
Knight-Ridder, Feb. 4, 2004
What Went Wrong
Newsweek, Feb. 9 2004 issue
Intelligence Officer: We Were Overruled on WMD Dossier
The Independent, Feb. 4, 2004
Intelligence Chiefs 'Ignored WMD Warnings
The Guardian, Feb. 4, 2004
Don't Be Fooled Again
The Guardian, Feb. 4, 2004
Bush Accused of Undermining Investigation
The Guardian, Feb. 3, 2004
We Were All Wrong
US News, Feb. 9, 2004 issue
Swift and Secret: Blair's Inquiry
The Guardian, Feb. 4, 2004
Blame the Masters, Not the Servants
The Guardian, Feb. 3, 2004
Blowback: Bin
Laden Comes Home to Roost
MSNBC.com, Aug. 24, 1998
Blowback
The Nation, Oct. 15, 2001
Rebuilding America's Defenses
Project for the New American Century, Sept. 2000,
American Dominance [PNAC]
The Bergen Record, Feb. 23, 2003
Case for War Confected, Say U.S. Officials
The Independent, Nov. 9, 2003
Drawing Their Own Picture
Boston Globe, Feb. 1, 2004
The Rumsfeld Intelligence
Agency
Slate.com, Oct. 28, 2002
Stingers, Stingers, Who's Got the Stingers?
Slate.com, Oct. 2, 2001
|